Thank you so much for your answer, Michael. To use "embed" was what I thought first, but it did not work. Then I found out, people are using "link", "comment", etc and it worked with using "link" for an article of mine, but not with "comment".
I am glad you helped clarify how to (normally) use it :)
I'm a friendly non-developer from NC who enjoys playing music/making noise, eating veggies, and hanging out with my best friend/wife, our 2 cats, and greyhound. (he/him)
And yep, this is a bit confusing. We actually recently changed out syntax for embeds, simplifying things so that folks can just use "embed" without having to remember what type of embed it is (i.e. "link", "comment", etc.) That said, I believe it was built in such a way that the older methods still work.
I'm a friendly non-developer from NC who enjoys playing music/making noise, eating veggies, and hanging out with my best friend/wife, our 2 cats, and greyhound. (he/him)
I'm a friendly non-developer from NC who enjoys playing music/making noise, eating veggies, and hanging out with my best friend/wife, our 2 cats, and greyhound. (he/him)
Thank you so much for your answer, Michael. To use "embed" was what I thought first, but it did not work. Then I found out, people are using "link", "comment", etc and it worked with using "link" for an article of mine, but not with "comment".
I am glad you helped clarify how to (normally) use it :)
You're very welcome! 🙌
And yep, this is a bit confusing. We actually recently changed out syntax for embeds, simplifying things so that folks can just use "embed" without having to remember what type of embed it is (i.e. "link", "comment", etc.) That said, I believe it was built in such a way that the older methods still work.
Alrighty! Just wanted to point out that a fix is in for this issue and should be live in just a few after 3 PM UTC. 🙌
Big thanks for asking this question and making us aware of this issue!! 😀
Yep, it's working. Thank you so much!!
Woot! Happy to hear it. 😀